Sample Space Description. The sample space, as described for a similar problem by Feller [1, pg 18], is the union of these strings
HH | HTT | HTHH | HTHTT | … |
TT | THH | THTT | THTHH | … |
and the following “never have two in a row” possibilities.
HTHTHTHTHT... THTHTHTHTH...
This space is of course countably infinite as we can (again in the fashion of Feller) order the sample points like this,
HTHTHTHTHT..., THTHTHTHTH..., HH, TT, HTT, THH, HTHH, THTT, ...
which is akin to mapping 1 and 2 to the two infinite sequences and then continuing the mapping in a zig-zag pattern across the finite sequences listed above.
Part (a) solution. The probability that the experiment ends prior to the sixth toss is the probability of the event corresponding to the union any of the events described by, pardon the regular expression, “the experiemnt ends on the (second—third—fourth—fifth)”. Hence because none of the events in such a union can occur at the same time, we simply add their respective probabilities, yielding to use that the experiment ends before the sixth toss with probability
Part (b) solution. The probability that the experiment ends on an even number of tosses is just the sum of all the probabilities for every “ending on an even number of tosses”,
Now I’m not really great at seeing infinite series and knowing the total, but I was able to spot that the probabilities of the events “ending on odd” and the ones “ending on even” are going to be disjoint, which in turn lead me to the following form of the probability of the event that “an odd number of tosses are required“.
Hence we know that P(Odd) = 1∕2P(Even), which indicates, since these two events partition the sample space, that the probability that an even number of tosses is required is 2∕3.
A:
B:
C:
A:
possible initial combinations.
B:
initial combinations.
C:
possible combinations of initials.
Solution. Since there is no order to the dominoes, then we shall count possible sets of the numbers 1,2,…,n. Sets of size two would correspond to a domino with two distinct numbers and a set of size one would correspond to a domino with two of the same numbers. Hence the total number of possible dominos are the total number of sets of size two and of size one. Hence the total number of dominos is
A:
are the number of ways that 1 and 2 apper in order as neighbors.
B:
Solution. To say that A wins if he scores at least one ace is to say that he does not win if no aces appear. So assuming that an ace is a one (or really just any single side of the die) then A will win with probability
since there are 56 possible ways to roll and not score no aces.
To say that B wins if he scores at least two aces, is to say that he loses if no aces appear or only a single ace appears. The number of these cases for a twelve-die roll are 512 and 511, respectively. Thus the probability that B wins is given by the following.
Therefore we have that A has the better chance of winning out of the two.
Solution. Assuming that the balls are inditinguishable, then the total number of possible outcomes is (5.2) from Feller,
or in our case,
Since we are counting the number of results with one and only one empty cell, then each cell can possibly be empty, i.e. n ways, and for each of those empty cells, there are n- 1 ways that the cell containing two balls can be arranged, since such a cell must exist when one and only one cell is empty. Hence we have that the probability that there will be one and only one cell left empty is
which to give some perspective, is 2/3, 0.6, 0.34286, and 0.15873 for two, three, four, and five, respectively.
A:
B:
C:
Hence if we just stick in a negative one in place of the one on the right side, we arrive at
yielding to us the answer for which we are looking.
D:
Naive Problem Solver’s Lament. It seems like there could some sort of awesome high level understanding that could be used in a much better way here to manifest a proof. I wish I knew what that was and could describe the progression that one can begin to see happening above in a “neat”, “different” way that reveals a great understanding of what is actually happening here, right in front of our eyes.
Solution. Using the formula in (8.6) we have that the left hand side of the above equation is equal to
in which there are n + 1 terms on the left-hand side and 2n + 1 terms on the right. All the terms on the right-hand side now (obviously) cancel save for , , and ±, of which the first two are the same since there is only one way to choose a set of zero, leaving us with
where the sign is dependent on whether or not n is even. Thus the form
takes care of that nicely.
[1] Feller, William. “An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications” Volume I 3rd. Ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc: 1968.
Showing that