Math 508: Advanced Analysis
Homework 1
Lawrence Tyler Rush
<me@tylerlogic.com>
September 10, 2014
http://coursework.tylerlogic.com/courses/upenn/math508/homework01
1 For rational r≠0 and irrational x, prove that r + x and rx are irrational.
Since r is rational, both 1∕r and -r are rational. Thus, if r + x were rational
then
would imply x is rational by the closure of addition in the field of rationals; but since x is assumed to be irrational, so must
be r + x.
Similarly, rx must be irrational since
and the field of rationals is closed under multiplication.
2 Prove that there’s no rational number with a square of 12
Lemma 2.1. The square root of 3 is irrational.
Proof. Assume for later contradiction that 3 is rational. Then we can find integers m,n which are not both even
such that m∕n = . Therefore
This equation then demands that if n2 is even, then so must be m2 (and therefore m), and similarly if n2 is odd, then so
must be m2 (and therefore m). Because m and n were assumed to not both be even, then m and n must
both be odd. Thus we can set m = 2p + 1 and n = 2q + 1. Furthermore the above equation implies that
however, the left-hand side of the last line above is even and the right-hand side is odd; a contradiction. So 3 must be
irrational. __
Since = 2 the previous problem and the above lemma together imply that is irrational.
3 Prove the following from the field axioms for multiplication.
(a) If x≠0 and xy = xz, then y = z
Let x≠0 and xy = xz, then
(b) If x≠0 and xy = x, then y = 1
This follows from the previous part for z = 1.
(c) If x≠0 and xy = 1, then y = 1∕x
Again, this follows from the first part of this problem for z = 1∕x.
(d) If x≠0 then 1∕(1∕x) = x
Let x≠0, then
4 Rudin p.23 #17
For x,y ∈ ℝn with the Euclidean distance, we have
Geometrically, if |x| and |y| are the two lengths of two adjacent sides of a parallelogram, then |x + y| and |x-y| would
be the lengths of the two diagonals. So this equation reveals that the sum of the squares of the diagonals of a parallelogram
is equal to twice the sum of the squares of its sides.
5 Fix a,b ∈ ℝk. Show there exist c ∈ ℝk and r ∈ ℝ such that ∀x ∈ ℝk, |x - a| = λ|x - b| iff |x - c| = r, for
λ > 1
Letting (λ2 - 1)c = λ2b - a and r = λ(λ2 - 1)-1|b - a| we obtain
| (5.1) |
Now assuming that |x - a| = λ|x - b| for some point x ∈ ℝk we get the following sequence of equations.
At this point, Equation 5.1 yields the fact that (λ2 - 1)|c|2 = (λ2 - 1)-1, so making that
substitution into the last line from the sequence of equations above, we continue: With the final line above we must have |x - c| = r since both |x - c| and r are positive values (r being positive because
λ > 1). So we have that |x - a| = λ|x - b| implies that |x - c| = r; however, reversing the order of equations above also
reveals that |x - c| = r implies |x - a| = λ|x - b|, giving us the “iff” we desire.
What happens when λ = 1?
When λ = 1, we’d be interested in all points x ∈ ℝk where |x-a| = |x-b|. However the points that satisfy this are the
points in the hyper-plane that perpendicularly bisects the line segment, which of course has no notion of a radius since
it is a hyper-plane and not a hyper-sphere. Hence it makes no sense to inquire about a sphere of radius
r = λ(λ2 - 1)-1|b - a|; this is dually supported by the denominater, (λ2 - 1), having a value of zero when
λ = 1. In a silly way of thinking, it’s as if the sphere gets so big (as λ approaches 1) that it “becomes a
plane”.
6 Prove that a union of a countable number of finite sets is countable
Lemma 6.1. If S1,S2,S3,… are finite sets that are mutually disjoint, then ∪j=1∞Si is countable.
Proof. First note that if any Si is the empty set it can simply be neglected. So fix an ordering of each of the elements of
each set Si and label them as follows
where
ni =
|Si|. With this labeling, the following correspondence shows that
∪j=1∞Sj is countable
__
Let S1,S2,S3,… each be a finite set. The problem here is that these sets are not mutually disjoint, but nevertheless, we
can define the sets T1,T2,T3,… as T1 = S1 and Tn = Sn -∩j=1n-1Sj and furthermore, ∩j=1n-1Tj = ∩j=1n-1Sj. So due
to the above lemma, ∩j=1n-1Tj is countable and therefore so is A = ∩j=1n-1Sj.
7 Prove that the algebraic numbers are countable
Define the sets S1,S2,S3,… by
Now with this definition, the set A = ∪i=1∞Si will contain only algebraic numbers, but it will furthermore contain all of
the algebraic numbers since if z is the root of anxn + + a1x + a0 and some ai has |ai| > n, then z will be in the SN
where N = max(|a0|,…,|an|) since z will also be a root of 0xN + 0xN-1 + + 0xn+1 + anxn + + a1x + a0. Also,
because a polynomial of degree n has at most n roots and the set ℤ ∩ [-n,n] is finite for any n, then each of the sets Si
are finite. Therefore, the previous problem gives us that A (the set of algebraic numbers) is a countable
set.
8 Defining real exponents
Let b > 1 be real and m,n,p,q ∈ ℤ, r ∈ ℚ such that r = m∕n = p∕q
(a) Prove 1∕n = 1∕q
Since m∕n = p∕q, then mq = np and through use of the laws of integer exponents
we obtain
So it makes sense to define br = 1∕n
(b) Prove br+s = brbs for rational r,s
Let s = a∕b for a,b ∈ ℤ. Then we have
which in turn allows
through the use of properties of integer exponents and the previous part of this problem.
(c) Prove that br = sup B(r)
Define B(r) = {bt | t ∈ ℚ and t ≤ r}. Because br ∈ B(r), f(t) = bt is
monitonically increasing since b > 0, and any bt ∈ B(r) for rational t would have t ≤ r, then br must be
supB(r).
(d) Definining bx = sup B(x) ∀x ∈ ℝ, show that bx+y = bxby for x,y ∈ ℝ
Define B(x,y) = {bsbt | s,t ∈ ℚ and s ≤ x,t ≤ y}. By an argument identical to
the previous part of this problem, we have supB(x,y) = bxby. However B(x,y) is also {bs+t | s,t ∈ ℚ and s ≤ x,t ≤ y},
which is the same as {bt | t ∈ ℚ and t ≤ x + y}. Of course this last set is just the definition of B(x + y), so
bx+y = supB(x + y) = supB(x)supB(y) = bxby.
9 Prove that there exist real numbers that are not algebraic.
The set of real numbers is uncountable, whereas the set of algebraic
numbers is countable, as per problem seven. So there are “too many” real numbers for all of them to be
algebraic.
10 Is the set of all irrational numbers countable? Why?
No, the irrational numbers are not countable.
Each rational number r = p∕q with p,q ∈ ℤ, q≠0, is the root of f(z) = qz -p, implying that the rational numbers are a
subset of the countable algebraic numbers, i.e. they’re countable. So because the rational numbers are countable, the union
of the rational and irrational numbers are the reals, and the reals are uncountable, then the irrational numbers are
necessarily uncountable.