for complex z
Therefore
⁄→ 0, implying the divergence of ∑
in this case.
Now assume that |z| > 1. Then |zn| increases as n gets large and |zn + 1| > 2. So let N be such that |zn| > 2 for all n > N. Then
![]() | (1.1) |
for all n > N. By separating ∑
like so

equation 1.1 informs us that

Now the left addend of the right-hand side of the above inequality is a finite sum and the right addend is a convergent
geometric series since 0 <
< 1. Thus the right-hand side of the above inequality converges, implying the convergence of
the left-hand side, ∑
n=1∞
. This in turn implies that our series in question is absolutely convergent when |z| > 1, and
therefore convergent.

so due to the convergence of ∑ an, then M ∑ an and therefore ∑ |anbn| converges. Hence ∑ anbn converges absolutely, and so converges.

approaches z as n increases, then the ratio test tells us that the radius of convergence is 1.
zn
and so this series converges for all z, i.e. the radius is infinite.

approaches ∞ as n increases, then the ratio test tells us that the radius of convergence is 0, but technically, z = 0 will make the series converge.
for n ≥ 1
= 0
given the recursive definition. Therefore, L can only be
or
since these are the roots of that equation.
Now since a0 = 0, the recusive formula just adds a positive value of
, informing us that this sequence if monotonically
increasing. Furthermore, if an <
we see that

which simultaneously implies that the sequence is bounded and rules out 4∕5 as a possible limit. Thus the sequence is
monotonically increasing and bounded, implying that it must converge, and because the initial value is zero, the only point
it can converge to is
.
converges
+ an converge. This implies the convergence of {tn} where tn =
+
+
since each an ≥ 0. Thus
defining ∑
xn = ∑
implies that {tn} is the sequence of partial sums of ∑
xn and they form a bounded sequence.
Furthermore, defining ∑
yn as the harmonic series, we have y0 ≥ y1 ≥ y2 ≥
and limn→∞yn = 0. Thus Rudin’s Theorem
3.42 informs us that the series

converges.
+
+
+
+
> 100
∑
k=0K2ka2k > 100 then for N = 2K we’ll have 1 +
+
+
+
+
> 100. Thus since

then 1 +
> 100 implies that K > 198, so K = 199 and therefore N = 2199 will satisfy.
-
-
+
+
-
converges
we see that it is no different than ∑ cn where

This is an alternating series for which
converges to zero, so our original series must also converge by Rudin’s
theorem 3.43.
+ AN)
will be I and therefore
I - A will be invertibile. Since

we’ll have that I -A is invertible if ∑ n=0∞An converges. Thus because ∑ |An|≤∑ |A|n, the right side converges since it’s a geometric series and |A| < 1. This tells us that ∑ An converges absolutely and that therefore ∑ An converges. Hence we have our desired result of I - A being invertible.
and B be a matrix in the ε-ball of A. Then we have that
|A-B| < ε implying that |A-1||A-B| < 1. Thus |I -A-1B| < 1. By the previous part of the problem, we then know that
I -
= A-1B is invertible. Then there is some invertible matrix C with CA-1B = I. But then B is invertible
with inverse CA-1. Hence the ε-ball of A contains only invertible elements, and so the set of invertible matrices is
open.
Bounded. Since any othogonal matrix A has that AAt = I, then with our definition of the norm, |A|2 = ⟨A,A⟩ = trace(AAt) = trace(I) = n. Thus the set of othogonal matrices is bounded.