With this we can define four functions on R × R3:
f1(x,(y,z,u)) | = f(x,y,z,u) | (1.1) |
f2(y,(x,z,u)) | = f(x,y,z,u) | (1.2) |
f3(z,(x,y,u)) | = f(x,y,z,u) | (1.3) |
f4(u,(x,y,z)) | = f(x,y,z,u) | (1.4) |
(∂f1∕∂v)(0,(0,0,0)) | = | ||
(∂f2∕∂v)(0,(0,0,0)) | = | ||
(∂f3∕∂v)(0,(0,0,0)) | = | ||
(∂f4∕∂v)(0,(0,0,0)) | = |
det | = 1(4 - (-3)) - (-1)(-2 - 2) + (0)(3 - 4) = 11 | ||
det | = 3(4 - (-3)) - (-1)(2 - 2) + (0)(-3 - 4) = 21 | ||
det | = 3(-1 - 2) - (1)(2 - 2) + (0)(2 - (-2)) = -9 | ||
det | = 3(3 - 4) - (1)(-3 - 4) + (-1)(2 - (-2)) = 0 |
f1(0,g1(0)) | = f1(0,(0,0,0)) = (0,0,0) | ||
f2(0,g2(0)) | = f2(0,(0,0,0)) = (0,0,0) | ||
f3(0,g3(0)) | = f3(0,(0,0,0)) = (0,0,0) |
3x + y - z + u2 | = 0 | (1.5) |
x - y + 2z + u | = 0 | (1.6) |
2x + 2y - 3z + 2u | = 0 | (1.7) |
On the other hand, because the determinant of (∂f4∕∂v)(0,(0,0,0)) is zero then there is no function g4 : R → R3 with f4(0,g4(0)), implying that there is no solution to equations 1.5 through 1.7 for x,y,z in terms of u.
Then because
the implicit function theorem tells us that there exists a g : R2 → R such that g(1,-1) = 0 and f(x,y,g(x,y)) = 0 for all (x,y) in some neighborhood of (1,-1). Furthermore, since
and we know that
and
then we can solve for to get
thus
Similarly we have
so that
Let u denote the second component in R3 of f(t,u). Then the partial derivative with respect to u at the point (t,u) = (0,(-1,1,0)) is
which has determinant of 3(2 - 0) - 3(-2 - 0) + 0 = 12. The above matrix is therefore nonsingular, and hence the Implicit Function Theorem yields the existence of a function g : R → R3 defined on a neighborhood of 0 such that g(0) = (-1,1,0) and f(t,g(t)) = f(0,(-1,1,0)) = (0,2,0) for all points in that neighborhood. In turn, g implicitly defines three real-valued functions on R, x,y,z, where g(t) = (x(t),y(t),z(t)). With this notation, the previously mentioned result of the the Implicit Function Theorem can be restated as: there exists a neighborhood around (0,-1,1,0) such that f(t,(x(t),y(t),z(t))) = (0,2,0) for all t. In other words, given the definition of f, the following equations have solutions around (t,x,y,z) = (0,-1,1,0)
t2 + (x(t))3 + (y(t))3 + (z(t))3 | = 0 | ||
t + (x(t))2 + (y(t))2 + (z(t))2 | = 2 | ||
t + x(t) + y(t) + z(t) | = 0 |
f′((x,y),z) | = xz + sin(xy) + cos(xz) | ||
g′((y,z),x) | = xz + sin(xy) + cos(xz) | ||
h′((x,z),y) | = xz + sin(xy) + cos(xz) |
f′z | = z + y cos(xy) - z sin(xz) | ||
g′x | = xcos(xy) | ||
h′y | = x + xcos(xz) |
f′z(0,1,1) | = 2 | ||
g′x(0,1,1) | = 0 | ||
h′y(0,1,1) | = 0 |
| (5.8) |
By assumption ≠0 so that we may solve for f′ as
| (5.9) |
Again taking the derivative with respect to x in equation 5.8 yields
substituting equation 5.9 into this equation and then solving for f′′ leaves us with
which means that ≠0 whenever y≠-z. Hence any point of the form (x,y,-y) will have = 0 which implies that the largest neighborhood of (2,1,-4) will be the open ball with radius r where r is the distance from (2,1,-4) to the closest point of the form (x,y,-y). Since y≠ - z at the point (2,1,-4), we know that such an r will exist. We just need to find it.
To do so, we can find the minimum of the distance between (2,1,-4) and any point (x,y,-y), or equivalently the minimum of the square of the distance between (2,1,-4) and any point (x,y,-y). So define f : R2 → R by
With this definition we have
fx | = 2x - 4 | ||
fy | = 2y + 6 |
for which detH = 4 so that (2,-3) is indeed a minimum since the diagonals of H are both positive and its determinant is positive. Therefore
so that r = . Hence we set U to be the open ball of radius centered at (2,1,-4).